<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;After FCP7/FCS3… we still need DVKitchen!&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvcreators.net/after-fcp7fcs3%e2%80%a6-we-still-need-dvkitchen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/after-fcp7fcs3%e2%80%a6-we-still-need-dvkitchen/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=after-fcp7fcs3%25e2%2580%25a6-we-still-need-dvkitchen</link>
	<description>DVcreators.network: resources for digital video creators.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hardt</title>
		<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/after-fcp7fcs3%e2%80%a6-we-still-need-dvkitchen/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvcreators.net/?p=3435#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>The new FCp 7 has upgraded itself &amp; taken a lesson from DV Creators. However DV Kitchen is STILL a top of the line necessary product. I feel that every active editor / producer needs this tool. To determine your needs through the Sample Lab and be the master of your choice of bit rate &amp; then output your product is way worth the price. I am always pleased with results. Stable &amp; predictable.

Dundee10
IL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new FCp 7 has upgraded itself &amp; taken a lesson from DV Creators. However DV Kitchen is STILL a top of the line necessary product. I feel that every active editor / producer needs this tool. To determine your needs through the Sample Lab and be the master of your choice of bit rate &amp; then output your product is way worth the price. I am always pleased with results. Stable &amp; predictable.</p>
<p>Dundee10<br />
IL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/after-fcp7fcs3%e2%80%a6-we-still-need-dvkitchen/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvcreators.net/?p=3435#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t figure Compressor out. When I use the new feature &#039;Share&#039; in FCP7 and I select my home-made encoder-settings (which I made in Compressor) with x264 encoder 320x180 the quality is much worse compared to the &#039;old&#039; method of &#039;Export..&#039; and using the same settings (x264, 320x180).

Anybody any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t figure Compressor out. When I use the new feature &#8216;Share&#8217; in FCP7 and I select my home-made encoder-settings (which I made in Compressor) with x264 encoder 320&#215;180 the quality is much worse compared to the &#8216;old&#8217; method of &#8216;Export..&#8217; and using the same settings (x264, 320&#215;180).</p>
<p>Anybody any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

