<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe adds H.264 video support to Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash</link>
	<description>DVcreators.network: resources for digital video creators.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>terry simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-979</guid>
		<description>So, then, how do you make a movie in FCP, exported via Compressor that can be read by Flash and what is the extension --is it .mov or .flv?  Does that mean that my web person can bring it in directly without conversion to .flv?

Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, then, how do you make a movie in FCP, exported via Compressor that can be read by Flash and what is the extension &#8211;is it .mov or .flv?  Does that mean that my web person can bring it in directly without conversion to .flv?</p>
<p>Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aberracus</title>
		<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>aberracus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>The thing is simply Adobe is the defacto estandar in internet, if Apple let it them, supporting Flash in iPhone and Apple Tv it will only encourage propietary software growth (aka adobe flash), so really Apple is trying to fight the battle for an open web.. Im sure Apple is not doing it because they are heroes, its doing it because they dont want to be in the MS vs Apple fiasco of the ninties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is simply Adobe is the defacto estandar in internet, if Apple let it them, supporting Flash in iPhone and Apple Tv it will only encourage propietary software growth (aka adobe flash), so really Apple is trying to fight the battle for an open web.. Im sure Apple is not doing it because they are heroes, its doing it because they dont want to be in the MS vs Apple fiasco of the ninties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frosty</title>
		<link>http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Frosty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvcreators.net/adobe-adds-h264-video-support-to-flash/#comment-977</guid>
		<description>I think another reason for Adobe to adopt h.264 is they want to protect their hegemony as a video distribution format. Apple talking Google into converting their videos to the open h.264 standard threatened that I think. I&#039;m not sure why Apple doesn&#039;t support Flash on the iPhone or ?TV (at this point at least), but a part of me thinks that Adobe&#039;s probably pulling down some serious royalties.

In the end, I am glad that large companies support &quot;open&quot; formats - but wonder about their (Adobe&#039;s) motives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think another reason for Adobe to adopt h.264 is they want to protect their hegemony as a video distribution format. Apple talking Google into converting their videos to the open h.264 standard threatened that I think. I&#8217;m not sure why Apple doesn&#8217;t support Flash on the iPhone or ?TV (at this point at least), but a part of me thinks that Adobe&#8217;s probably pulling down some serious royalties.</p>
<p>In the end, I am glad that large companies support &#8220;open&#8221; formats &#8211; but wonder about their (Adobe&#8217;s) motives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

